It’s fair to say that not all theocratic systems are fascist, but they’re also not mutually exclusive. A particular theocratic system can also be fascist in nature.
Some common points:
Appeal to tradition
Rejection of modernism
Anti-intellectualism
Absolute factual authority of leaders
Obsession with outgroups as enemies, such as sinners and atheists and believers of other faiths
Special jargon to control the masses
Subordination of people to a greater cause
Jingoist militarism (ironic for a lot of “peaceful” religions)
Theocracy is theocracy. Which is not good or terribly useful or even stable as a system. But it is not fascism.
It’s fair to say that not all theocratic systems are fascist, but they’re also not mutually exclusive. A particular theocratic system can also be fascist in nature.
Some common points:
That’s a fair assessment I’d say.