Trump admits ‘various people’ saw ‘papers and boxes’ brought from White House - eviltoast

“Of course they did! They may have been the boxes etc. that were openly and plainly brought from the White House, as is my right under the Presidential Records Act,” Trump posted on social media.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s a law they have a legal duty, your hedging doesn’t particularly make sense.

    legal

    1 of 2

    adjective

    le·​gal ˈlē-gəl 

    Synonyms of legal

    1

    : of or relating to law

    She has many legal problems.

    2

    a

    : deriving authority from or founded on law : DE JURE

    a legal government

    b

    : having a formal status derived from law often without a basis in actual fact : TITULAR

    a corporation is a legal but not a real person

    c

    : established by law

    especially : STATUTORY

    the legal test of mental capacity—K. C. Masteller

    3

    : conforming to or permitted by law or established rules

    The referee said it was a legal play.

    Fishing in this lake is legal.

    4

    : recognized or made effective by a court of law as distinguished from a court of equity

    5

    : of, relating to, or having the characteristics of the profession of law or of one of its members

    a bottle … that some legal friend had sent him—J. G. Cozzens

    6

    : created by the constructions of the law

    A legal fiction is something assumed in law to be a fact regardless of the truth of that assumption.

    legal

    2 of 2

    noun

    : one that conforms to rules or the law

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not getting into semantics, I’m talking about the original post I replied to, namely

      he has a clear duty to protect their secrecy

      Which is talking about a duty in derived sense, not a codified duty.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        He does, nothing you’ve offered implies or states otherwise.

        No, it has to do with a law or rather a series of them an oath to office and an oath to maintain national secrets.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            18 usc 1924 Is a law that created a duty, a legal duty.

            (a)

            Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

            You say you don’t want to play semantics but that’s your entire argument.

            • roguetrick@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You actually don’t understand my argument. What you’re talking about now is WHY I think trump broke the law. It has nothing to do with oaths of office. Oaths of office do NOT create a legal duty. That code, as well as the administrative law around

              without authority

              from that code is what creates a legal duty.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I understand your argument, don’t be patronizing.

                No I don’t care what you think about Trump or if he broke the law.

                It does, you swear to follow the law they make you take it specifically so they can increase penalties, it quite literally increases legal responsibility.