We interrupt your programming rule - eviltoast
  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was, even had a cover for the USB port. I took a few baths with it (really dumb idea now that I think about it)

      • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the micro USB 3.0 v1 which was backwards compatible with micro usb. That’s right you could use the new fangled USB 3.0 port and cable and get those speeds as well as charging rate. Or… Use a bog generic USB micro USB 2.0 cable and it would still fit on one side of the port and was still useable for USB 2.0 speeds and charging rates.

        • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But I concede that it is one of the worst and most delicate ports ever stuck on something expected to have a plug jammed in it literally a thousand times.