Rule of 400 - eviltoast
  • OmegaMouse@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You seem to have a very binary view of things though. Is it not possible for someone to agree with a message, but think we can improve on how we tell it? If we want to convince people of something, is it not best to provide as convincing an argument as possible? I’m not trying to distract from the message, I’m wondering how we can tell it better.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You seem to have a very binary view

      Of distracting from the actual topic by needlessly fixating on an only tangentially relevant detail? Yeah, I’m kooky like that.

      Is it not possible for someone to agree with a message, but think we can improve on how we tell it?

      Sure, but that’s not what you’re doing. You’re, deliberately or not, pulling all attention away from the message by demanding a fix to something that, in the specific case, is unimportant.

      If we want to convince people of something, is it not best to provide as convincing an argument as possible?

      As I said before, being more exact would invite MORE distracting arguments about it, not fewer.

      I’m not trying to distract from the message

      You’re also not trying to NOT distract from the message either, though. Or you are and you’re doing a piss-poor job of it.

      I’m wondering how we can tell it better

      It was told just fine. You’re actively obscuring the salient point with your pedantry.