Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1695arrow-down110cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.devwebdev@programming.dev
arrow-up1685arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square100fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.devwebdev@programming.dev
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0