How Signal walks the line between anarchism and pragmatism - eviltoast
  • Darkhoof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Signal with a few of my friends. It has enough features to replace Whatsapp, but most people just don’t care about their privacy enough to change what’s convenient and already works for them even if they have zero privacy.

  • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you are willing to use Signal, you already don’t mind a tiny userbase, so why not use Session (or maybe Matrix) and enjoy privacy, security, AND anonymity?

    Signal has always been clear that privacy!=anonymity and regards people who want both as both stupid and unusual. Its always been a weird dance to watch.

    • eating3645@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the ux for signal is superior and I don’t care about anonymity when I’m communicating with friends and family.

      The right tool for the right job, and signal is the right tool for general communication, but I wouldn’t use it for my virtual pals.

      Essentially, I see entirely different use cases for decentralized options like matrix, session, xmpp.

    • themeltingclock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t done any Signal app recruiting in my circle of contacts (in fact, I don’t think I’ve talked to anyone about it) and I have 14 contacts that have it installed at the very least. I don’t think it would be a huge push to make Signal more prevalent.

      The uphill battle is making a dent in iMessage adoption, which seems to be deeper and deeper entrenched every day.

      • jrheronn@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Signal is by far much easier to get family/friends to use than Matrix or Session. Downloaded it to my parents’ phones and told them this is how you contact me.

        • randint@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          this is exactly what I did to my mother

          (this sentence sounds so scary out of context)

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        They dropped the native sms integration. IMO, that was the best tool for adoption. Make it seamless for people to move over from their native SMS messenger and people will use it. Going full closed, only signal to signal, meant I needed to use multiple messaging apps for different people. And I had to remember who is on which. It’s been a headache.

          • Shoresy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well this is interesting. I hadn’t heard of Beeper before. Many years ago I used Trillion (I think it was) as a chat aggregator. It fell apart pretty quickly, but Beeper looks promising. I signed up for their wait-list. We’ll see what happens.

            • Calcium5332@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              A bunch of Matrix bridges on one platform, with some extra funding. It looks cool, but isn’t lifechanging. It is designed to (hopefully) make it easier to use, but if you don’t care, you can set up the bridges yourself on your own matrix server.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m surprised it’s possible to talk to most of those services without having access to trade secrets. I guess you can get that info from reverse engineering the clients, but I’d expect that approach to be very brittle and possibly subject to legal action.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They dropped the native sms integration. IMO, that was the best tool for adoption.

          Depends on the market. In Europe SMS has become a separate, mostly read-only medium. We use it as a sort of notification channel for doctor appointments, due bills, online tickets, payment confirmations etc. Mixing this channel into a general purpose messenger app would actually hurt its adoption IMO.

        • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A friend used it. Once he didnt had data. He only got his sms notifications as soon he got data back. It was an interesting feature, but seems a bit bugged to me.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because you want to use it to talk to your friends, who know who you are anyway? I don’t get this need to wipe yourself completely from the face of the Earth.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        IMO the issue with Signal’s lack of anonymity isn’t that your friends know who you are; it’s that Signal itself can build a graph of everybody’s contacts.

        I mean, yes, I understand that Facebook, Google and a bunch of other companies can get the same info, but if I’m going to switch to something to be an improvement I would ideally want it to improve all the way instead of halfway.

    • Srootus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The concern with Session is that theyre based in Australia, a country that is in the 5 eyes, and their government passed a bill forces companies to provide a backdoor when ordered to, the company cannot deny to create this, and they can’t declose that they got ordered to ether. [A great video talking about said bill] While the Session devs say their services are resilient to these threats, [see their FAQ] it’s best to remain cautious.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks, I’ve been confused about all the different messaging apps for a while now, and having a feature comparison matrix like that is helpful.

          (I’d definitely be interested in other users’ opinions about how accurate/reliable/unbiased the information presented is, though!)

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This matrix doesn’t conflict with anything I’ve independently read about any of the protocols listed.

            It doesn’t list briar, which deserves mention.

    • dsemy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      SimpleX is also a good alternative, though a bit immature still.

    • teolan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the UX is horrible and they (especially matrix) have a ton of privacy/security issues that Signal doesn’t have

    • BlackRose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just checked, there are 97 Signal contacts on my phone.

      Edit: It’s all persons I really know

    • ouigol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Session is pretty slow in my experience, since it — as I understand it — works in a similar way to Tor. Images and videos are especially bad

    • lumpen2@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix is hella buggy, Session part of the lokinet weird ancap crypto scheme, XMPP is god tier

      Briar, now that’s a thingy

  • terminhell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was sad when signal changed to not include basic sms to non signal users. I don’t like having separate messengers for things like that. But it makes sense in the grand scheme. If I could get the few people I message the most to convert over I’d be happy.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it makes sense in the grand scheme.

      How? Signal doesn’t have the leverage to get the bulk of users to stop using SMS. So all that move did was to force people to reinstall an SMS. Then, signal became yet another messaging app for like one contact to manage and forget about.

      Matrix does what signal does, but it’s distributed, unlike Signal. Plus you have protocol portability.

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        people on new phone are now auto enrolled to Google’s RCS. This poses a few issues:

        • if a user switches from RCS to SMS they’re now using a less secure messaging mechanism.
        • it’s confusing (to some not all) to have a very insecure method of messaging in a secure messaging app.
        • if a user switches from RCS to SMS and they don’t know to unregister, they’ll now be sent RCS messages that never arrive making Signal look like the cause of the problem.
        • Google hasn’t provided an Android API for RCS. the writing is on the wall, text messaging via alternative apps is no longer a long term option and a waste of developer resources when they could instead be improving what they do control, Signal.
        • SMS on Signal was already unmaintained and not that great.
        • SMS was a feature on a single platform, Android, and didn’t even sync to the desktop app, confusing some (not all) users.

        All that said, with limited resources and budget, they really should not be spending any dev points on 40 year old tech. does it suck for some? yes, absolutely. Is it the end of the world?

        Lastly, while I love Matrix, its not ready for prime time. I was able to get my grandma to install Signal and join group chats with almost no help. I wouldn’t fare as well with Matrix/Element.

  • SillySpy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great article. Signal has achieved a lot but still faces huge challenges. This article puts that all in perspective nicely

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank you for the reminder that I should donate to Signal for all the good things they have brought to the world.

  • lumpen2@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a conversation with a cryptographer who worked for Wickr he says none of the DoD or other government agents he knew trusted Signal 🤔 - personally I use Signal with my mom or personal friends as like the bottom tier of security, because metadata is a real thing, they don’t have to actually know what you’re talking about. Just using a phone number itself tells you most everything feds need to know if they’re really after you.

    if you actually want privacy use XMPP