Sundray@lemmus.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days ago"So, you're saying a third of the stock market is tied up in seven AI companies that have no way to become profitable and that this is a bubble that's going to burst...?"pluralistic.netexternal-linkmessage-square86linkfedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: techtakes@awful.systemseurope@feddit.orgtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1595arrow-down1external-link"So, you're saying a third of the stock market is tied up in seven AI companies that have no way to become profitable and that this is a bubble that's going to burst...?"pluralistic.netSundray@lemmus.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square86linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: techtakes@awful.systemseurope@feddit.orgtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·17 days ago they would have to sell us $800 billion worth of services over the life of today’s data centers $100 for a yearly AI subscription for each human is possible. The problem is, which jobs do the people have to pay for it?
minus-squarebigfondue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·17 days agoI don’t think so. Half of the population on earth lives on less than $6.85 a day https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/half-global-population-lives-less-us685-person-day
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·17 days ago The problem is, which jobs do the people have to pay for it? If one half wants to keep getting their wages, there should also be enough jobs for the other half. New jobs have to be created anyway.
minus-squarecausepix@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·17 days agoThat’s funny you think they will stop at just covering their costs once they have each and every human depending on their software. This is about infinite growth baby!
minus-squarelichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·17 days agoIt might be possible for people on the Fediverse. Lots of people working in the tech sector with a good salary. But we are not the norm.
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·14 days ago $100 for a yearly AI subscription for each human is possible. Or, more likely, companies doing something actually profitable will use AI and pay for it.
$100 for a yearly AI subscription for each human is possible. The problem is, which jobs do the people have to pay for it?
I don’t think so. Half of the population on earth lives on less than $6.85 a day
https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/half-global-population-lives-less-us685-person-day
If one half wants to keep getting their wages, there should also be enough jobs for the other half. New jobs have to be created anyway.
That’s funny you think they will stop at just covering their costs once they have each and every human depending on their software. This is about infinite growth baby!
It might be possible for people on the Fediverse. Lots of people working in the tech sector with a good salary. But we are not the norm.
Or, more likely, companies doing something actually profitable will use AI and pay for it.