Which TLDs are too risky for hosting? - eviltoast

With several Lemmy instances using the .ml TLD I’ve seen people mention others being risky as well. Which should be avoided?

  • oleorun@lemmy.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Funny that you say that: my first problem was of my own making - I was using arm64 hardware and Lemmy doesn’t quite support that architecture yet, so I ended up getting a Synology myself this week. It’s awaiting disks and then I plan on moving Lemmy to that box.

    Thanks for sharing that site - I’ll make good use of it once the drives get here.

    The instructions worked out, but the troubleshooting steps need to be fleshed out more. Again, probably my issues, like DNS. I learned a lot though.

    • slugworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love my Synology NAS. It’s the DS920+. I’ve had it for a couple years. I upgraded the memory to 8 GB and use Portainer for a docket UI. I have 24 containers running on my NAS now, including sab, radarr, sonarr, deluge, joplin, piped/hyperpipe, youtubedl, jellyfin, pihole, and lemmy. 8gb of memory and about 45% used. Plex also runs as a native DSM package.

      • oleorun@lemmy.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got the DS923+. It’s replacing a very old but very functional QNAP that I’ve had for years. Alas, QTS or whatever the OS is called is slow and clunky and after using our DS920+ at work I made the decision to get a Synology.