Zoos aren’t for animals. They’re for us. | Zoos say they’re leaders in protecting wildlife. But is it true? - eviltoast
    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then you feel about as well as you think, cause I havent even fired a gun since I was 20, recreationally or otherwise.

      Its cute how you tried to turn an attack on native americans into some parallel with restricted hunting seasons tho. Insanely racist and massively offensive to the native american survivors, but also quite cute in a “bumbling dipshit” kinda way.

      Do you do that often? Say really racist shit to mask how little you actually understand about the topic?

      • the_q@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh brother… I didn’t realize I was arguing with a moron. My mistake, smooth brain.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, right. When you get caught saying racist things, drop some 4chan slang.

          High class, you really are cementing why your voice is of a higher caliber than decades of scientific research.

          • the_q@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You clearly know more about racism, 4chan and being a fucking nut job better than anyone here so I’ll defer to you on matters you’re clearly more knowledge about than me.

            Anyone truly in the scientific community would know that challenging long held scientific beliefs and having those change with new evidence is what it’s all about. But then again what can any of us expect from someone who jumps to talks about racism in an argument about any thing other than race.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You brought up the attempted extinction of buffalo in the northern US continent, and compared it to modern deer hunting.

              An attempted extinction that was explicitly stated by the officials who ordered it to be an attempt to starve the native population into submission or death, whichever came first.

              That is not “”“challenging long held scientific beliefs.”“” Thats you, being a racist little git, pretending that current hunting of deer which isnt associated with minority group survival and explicitly has hunting restrictions to prevent risk of damage to overall population counts is equivalent to a horrific attempt at ethnic cleansing.

              I am even willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just so damned ignorant that you had no idea that the only reason the american bison was removed from the americas was to starve the natives. Sure, why not. But if that was true, your response to double down shows this isnt about science, or learning, its about you putting feelings first and researching never.