tintory@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoWhen Foster Parents Don’t Want to Give Back the Babywww.propublica.orgexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up184arrow-down14cross-posted to: politics@beehaw.org
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkWhen Foster Parents Don’t Want to Give Back the Babywww.propublica.orgtintory@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@beehaw.org
minus-squaredragonflyteaparty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year ago available income to support the child So poor people don’t get to have kids, huh? Which is easily and quickly turn into only rich people get to have kids. How would you enforce that? Involuntary sterilization? Involuntary abortions?
minus-squareYoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down8·1 year agoWhy would you have kids if you are unable to support the kids?
minus-squarerbhfd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoRather than forcing basically eugenics on people, why not make sure that everyone is able to support children?
minus-squareWogi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoSocialism?! In MY America?! No no, a fascist eugenics state that preys on poor brown people is clearly the better option.
So poor people don’t get to have kids, huh? Which is easily and quickly turn into only rich people get to have kids. How would you enforce that? Involuntary sterilization? Involuntary abortions?
Why would you have kids if you are unable to support the kids?
Rather than forcing basically eugenics on people, why not make sure that everyone is able to support children?
Socialism?! In MY America?!
No no, a fascist eugenics state that preys on poor brown people is clearly the better option.