TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoShareholders-chan 🥺 rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down110
arrow-up1475arrow-down1imageShareholders-chan 🥺 rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50·1 month agoAs a shareholder, I want AI “art” to die in a fire
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·1 month agoClearly not a majority. My guess is they’re too scared that they’ll lose some competitive advantage by not greenlighting every misguided use of generative AI
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoTo be fair, it’s not like the people in charge of the companies are asking us.
minus-squaremegopie@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThey’re asking large institutional shareholders. Stuff like black rock and people who manage investments for pension funds.
As a shareholder, I want AI “art” to die in a fire
Clearly not a majority. My guess is they’re too scared that they’ll lose some competitive advantage by not greenlighting every misguided use of generative AI
To be fair, it’s not like the people in charge of the companies are asking us.
They’re asking large institutional shareholders. Stuff like black rock and people who manage investments for pension funds.
Amen!