Australians vote No in referendum that promised change for First Nations people but couldn’t deliver - eviltoast

With a two-letter word, Australians have struck down the first attempt at constitutional change in 24 years, major media outlets reported, a move experts say will inflict lasting damage on First Nations people and suspend any hopes of modernizing the nation’s founding document.

Early results from the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) suggested that most of the country’s 17.6 million registered voters had written No on their ballots, and CNN affiliates 9 News, Sky News and SBS all projected no path forward for the Yes campaign.

The proposal, to recognize Indigenous people in the constitution and create an Indigenous body to advise government on policies that affect them, needed a majority nationally and in four of six states to pass.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, what does a right way to accomodate indigenous groups look like? Has any country accomplished it?

    What rights or opportunities are these groups lacking?

    • Striker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A good way to start would be making sure they have adequate political representation. Shutting them out of the politically. When you don’t get a groups voice in when making decisions that can lead to consequences. Big issues that aboriginals face in extremely high unemployment, decaying infrastructure and high incarceration rates.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do they not get a vote? And all i hear is the negative statistics, never what people think should be done to address them. Are employers discriminating?

        Does any of it stem from them wanting to live more primitively? Are they turning down education opportunities, or are they not available to them?

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do they not get a vote?

          Oh hey look, every indiginous person voted for racial bias training for police, but guess what? The millions of white people voted that they don’t think they really need it so we’re not gonna spend the money on it.

          Giving a relatively tiny disparate population “a vote” doesn’t actually address any of their needs.

          Are employers discriminating?

          Yes.

          Does any of it stem from them wanting to live more primitively?

          No.

          Are they turning down education opportunities, or are they not available to them?

          High quality education is not readily available to them, nor is the infrastructure they need to thrive and the government has invested little to nothing into their infrastructure in comparison to what they invested in abusing them over decades, what they’ve invested in white cities and towns, and what the value of the land and resources that were stolen from the indigenous people actually are.

        • jagungal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Them wanting to live on their ancestral lands to which they have a deep cultural and spiritual connection isn’t “wanting to live more primitively”. Because Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples often live in remote communities they do not have anything like the educational or employment opportunities that most of the country get.