Australia rejects proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in constitution - eviltoast

Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sunce Lemmy constitutes 99% ‘Yes men’ circlejerks ill try to rationalize the opposition. From what I was told, there is no language in the proposal to suggest the extent of how the Aboriginals power over any matter. It gave them the freedom to be a blockade in matters that dont even affect them. This is what an aus friend has told me.

    • Seudo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The amendment if full,

      i. there shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice; 

      ii. the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples;

      iii. the Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures

      So… No. Your friend is full of shit. It provides no powers whatsoever.

      The same parliament ignoring indigenous voices for a century will be the only one free to listen to “the” indigenous voice.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Your friend was wrong. All it required was that a designated group of people be consulted with to discuss an issue - if they wanted to discuss it. There was no veto power attached or any other additional rights or privileges conveyed.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Again, I’m not from the area and i only have what I was told. I was just putting what I was told how I understood it, maybe I misunderstood, maybe its Maybelline.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I misunderstood my friends position… but yeah your post is the only one showing both positions.

    • TheDankHold@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Now that two people have shattered the circlejerk you live in are you going to reassess anything? Maybe let your Australian friend know that he was duped too.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol i dont know, i was playing telephone… I may have just jumbled it all up. You guys are ridiculous.