Why BBC doesn't call Hamas militants 'terrorists' - John Simpson - eviltoast

I guess not strictly news - but with all of the vitriol I have seen in discussions on the Israel situation, that have boiled down to arguments over wording, I feel that this take from the BBC is worthy of some discussion.

Mods, feel free to remove if this is not newsy enough.

  • Nighed@sffa.communityOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While us Brits love to complain about the BBC being biased (probably an actual issue for internal UK politics) its good to remember that it’s still a world leading media outlet, and one of very few that can be considered not to be push an agenda. (I imagine I can find a lot of people that can probably disagree with that too…)

    Even Routers has started editorialising, and I thought they were just meant to be raw facts!

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much all news sources are good for something, so long as it’s outside of their bias’ sphere of influence. A fully state run national news outlet can potentially give very unbiased news about events in another country - maybe even better than local news sources - so long as there isn’t some conflict of interest.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Regardless of their wording, BBC news has a super Israel bias, and they even got called out on live TV during the news for it. They are not the place for unbiased reporting of this specific issue. The UK will always pretend Israel can do no wrong because they created them.