Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting - eviltoast
  • Ketil Froyn@mas.to
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    @floofloof They charge €40 for access, yet one is left wondering what sort of peer review this paper has undergone when obvious signs of generative AI has slipped in. What about less obvious signs? If the “authors” had simply used the copy-to-clipboard icon in chatgpt, they would have been all good and this would never have been uncovered.

    If anything, this is an argument for free public access to scientific papers. Any experts on AI could scan and detect this, even when it’s more subtle.