@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square175fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·2 years agoDuckDuckGo is just Bing.
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·2 years agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
minus-squareTick_Dracy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoDDG is a search engine without its own search engine.
DuckDuckGo is just Bing.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Removed by mod
DDG is a search engine without its own search engine.