@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square175fedilink
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·1 year agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.