Shouting at children can be as damaging as physical or sexual abuse, study says - eviltoast

Parents who shout at their children or call them “stupid” are leaving their offspring at greater risk of self-harm, drug use and ending up in jail, new research claims.

Talking harshly to children should be recognised as a form of abuse because of the huge damage it does, experts say.

The authors of a new study into such behaviour say “adult-to-child perpetration of verbal abuse … is characterised by shouting, yelling, denigrating the child, and verbal threats”.

“These types of adult actions can be as damaging to a child’s development as other currently recognised and forensically established subtypes of mistreatment such as childhood physical and sexual abuse,” the academics say in their paper in the journal Child Abuse & Neglect.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    using equivalency phrases on things that are very much not equivalent. Also scientific studies are great in the hard sciences but in the social sciences become very iffy. Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

      Where did anyone say this? You’re trying to sound knowledgeable about science, but all you’re doing is making up strawmen to argue against over and over

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        its a reply to iamthetots comment about scientific studies. one thing that is frustrating with federation is sometimes folks don’t see all the people or parts of a convo

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I read that comment, that doesn’t change the fact that you’re creating strawman arguments

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            explain strawman argument and how my conversation fits into it because I do not believe my conversation has been one. Or not if you don’t really believe its a strawman argument. Make some other comment if thats the case.