Why aren't advertisers (Microsoft, Facebook, Google) held responsible for allowing scammy adverts? - eviltoast

I know they allow scam adverts because it’s easy money, but why aren’t they held responsible for facilitating obvious scams? You open Edge, there’s 3 “Earn money quick” adverts. On Instagram, every 5 ads, one is a scam.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes sense when you’re dealing with actual services or products, but I’ve yet to see a single “earn 200 per hour” ad that isn’t a scam or “legal” pyramid, those should be easy enough to block and ban, no?

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who decides which legal businesses are allowed to run ads?

      I completely agree that MLMs are a “scam” but they are legitimate businesses in the eyes of the law. You suggested we ban them, so what defines who is allowed to advertise and who isn’t? I’m not comfortable with leaving it as “anything somebody in charge doesn’t like”.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some extra regulation on advertising might at least help somewhat, “Any adverts promising financial gains must clearly demonstrate how said gain is to be achieved”

      • skulblaka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely agree that MLMs are a “scam” but they are legitimate businesses in the eyes of the law.

        Then they shouldn’t be. Problem solved, next question?