Capitalism is when 1 in 10 people don't eat - eviltoast
  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    i don’t buy the numbers, i think there’s more people struggling to put food on the table than what this says.

    • cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a valid point. Living paycheck to paycheck or eating ramen every night ought to count if they aren’t already counting those

      • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Food insecure

        At times during the year, these households were uncertain of having or unable to acquire enough food to meet the needs of all their members because they had insufficient money or other resources for food. Food-insecure households include those with low food security and very low food security.

        Low food security

        These food-insecure households obtained enough food to avoid substantially disrupting their eating patterns or reducing food intake by using a variety of coping strategies, such as eating less varied diets, participating in Federal food assistance programs, or getting food from community food pantries.

        Very low food security

        In these food-insecure households, normal eating patterns of one or more household members were disrupted and food intake was reduced at times during the year because they had insufficient money or other resources for food.

        I’d say Ramen only would fall under low food security, because it’s a less varied diet.