The Canadian Takeover: Why Trump's Annexation Goal Could Backfire Spectacularly - eviltoast

Warning! Canada could take over the United States. This isn’t hyperbole—it’s political mathematics.

Our northern neighbor encompasses ten provinces and three territories, including the legendary Yukon. While Canadians may appear reserved, underestimating them at the negotiating table would be a serious miscalculation. They certainly won’t accept becoming a single state. Instead, they’ll insist on statehood for each province and territory. Under our Constitution, each state receives two senators—meaning Canada would instantly gain 26 senators, enough to form the decisive swing bloc in our upper chamber.

That’s troubling enough, but the scenario worsens when considering Canada’s vast geography. Their shrewd negotiators would undoubtedly invoke American precedent to subdivide their political entities. After all, in 1889, our Dakota Territory was split into North and South Dakota. Maine was carved from Massachusetts in 1820, and West Virginia separated from Virginia during the Civil War. Following this established pattern, Canada could reasonably demand twice as many states—and twice as many senators.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We will jihad the shit out of you if you invade.

    Converting to Islam is a… weird way to handle a foreign invasion, but I’ll take it.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Jihad is just a compact word for “get the fuck out of my country you invader or else”. Maybe you know an english word that carries all that weight?

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don’t just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.

      – James Nicoll.

      That Arabic word, “Jihad,” sure looks handy for situations like this. Yoink! It’s an English word now!