Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris - eviltoast

Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I think Americans have had it,” Walz explained. ”… Look, I own this. We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election ― and we didn’t.”

    Good to see someone from the campaign acknowledge “getting votes” was the campaign’s entire job, and losing the election is the fault of the campaign.

    I hope Walz runs in a competitive primary and gets the nomination.

    But if they try to just hand a baton off, we’re gonna see the same result.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          51
          ·
          2 days ago

          I feel like if Biden had stuck with something like, “I’m going to be one term and let some younger folks lead, we need some folks who are going to see the consequences of their actions running the show, not 70 and 80 year olds.” and had an actual primary, Harris wouldn’t have been the nominee and said nominee would have won. There’s a few other things that could have helped, but the short campaign was definitely a huge stumbling block.

          • Yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve seen people argue Biden and Jamie Harrison had a following out, and that Biden never really planned to run again, he just wanted to spoil the primary and push a very unpopular Harris onto the ticket.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes indeed, but also primaries can help to attract voters. I think the Sanders campaigns, though he didn’t win, made young people more likely to vote Democrat.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          We did, in fact, have primaries. There were like 9 choices for the Democratic nominee in my state. Better challengers could have run but didn’t. Yes I know the DNC using funding to “encourage” or “discourage” but that doesn’t change the fact that challengers could have, and did, run in the primaries.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              That is partially true. We the voters did not vote for Harris, but the Biden delegates who the primary voters sent to the convention did.

              • CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, and Biden was old. Even before his obvious deterioration, there was always a chance he wouldn’t make it through the term and Kamala would have to step up. If you voted for Biden in the primaries and were NOT ready for a potential future of a Harris presidency, I don’t know what you were thinking.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Your proof that we didn’t have primaries is to link a source that shows that not only did 48 states have a primary (I wasn’t aware that Florida and Delaware did not, so TIL, and thank you for that), but also that all of them had at least one challenger on the ballot? Show me who qualified to be on the primary ballot in their state, showed up to register for it, and was denied.

              • davidgro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’m not who posted it, but that list is either wrong or varies by county. My state is listed with a couple other candidates in various colors including green, but my actual primary ballot was Biden or nobody. (Or Trump or nobody). I just recycled it.

                  • davidgro@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    How should I know?

                    Anyway, I also forgot to mention if this did vary by county, that mine is the most populated county in the state and would have directed the election outcome.

          • Stern@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Primaries are kind of a moot point for the incumbent if they want to run again.

            Trump in 2020 had 2,549 delegates. The next closest was Bill Weld with 1.
            Biden in 2024 had 3,905 delegates. The next closest was uncommitted with 37.
            Obama in 2012 had 3,514 delegates. The next closest there was also uncommitted, with 72.
            Bush in 2004 had a clean delegate sweep of 2,509.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yep. But it’s generally (just learned that Florida and Delaware Democratic parties cancelled theirs in 2024) not because the state parties just reject any other names to be put on the primary ballot. But there’s still a lot of people saying there was no primary or that the DNC wouldn’t let any challengers run. Just generally misplaced anger that they didn’t have better Presidential candidates to vote for when the reality is that better people just chose not to run. Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

              • Stern@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

                There’d have to be a primary challenger who beat the incumbent first, and I don’t think that one has happened. I know Ted Kennedy got relatively close (Well, closer then the others I’ve mentioned, still blown out 1900 to 1200 delegates) to knocking out Carter on the Dem side, other then that, Reagan and Ford in 1976 was decided 1,121 to 1078 for Ford.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      NO! NO! NO!

      NOOOOOOO!

      Do not nominate Tim Walz you stupid assholes. He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans. He wanted to “expand israel’s borders”. He was elected in a district that ran straight red like the blood of the innocence for a long time before he won it, and then he lost that district during the election.

      • forrcaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        We have free public school lunches for all our kids here in Minnesota because of Governor Walz. How the fuck is that “blue republican”?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          He might be further left than any republican but hes as far right as a Democrat can be. As I have said before I will vote for him, but I gurantee you millions of leftists won’t.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans.

        The what Harris campaign?

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nope, because the majority of the people that are in these comments in this post and in several others that are acknowledging that the Democrats fucked up will start punching left again in about three years. And they will repeat their failures from 2016 2020 2024.