Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agoStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down15cross-posted to: WorkReform@europe.pubantiwork@europe.pub
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comSir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square129fedilinkcross-posted to: WorkReform@europe.pubantiwork@europe.pub
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·edit-221 days agoYes, but that’s irrelevant, just an accidental “post-” fact. I think more relevant basic math is that he got a 2.6% bonus in terms of annual net income of the group. The other 97.4% of labour just goes to shareholders (“landlords” of the financial system).
Yes, but that’s irrelevant, just an accidental “post-” fact.
I think more relevant basic math is that he got a 2.6% bonus in terms of annual net income of the group.
The other 97.4% of labour just goes to shareholders (“landlords” of the financial system).