Before / after graffiti - eviltoast
  • thonofpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I find that it makes most sense to me to answer “is this and that art”-questions with a yes by default. Is it made by a human with the intent to convey a message? Art. Any other approach always seems to end in questions of taste.

      • thonofpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I don’t like that particular art form and choose not to look at it whenever possible, I’d say yes. A lot of art tries to get you to think, feel or do something and I don’t see how this is fundamentally different, even though it seems a little sick at first. From the perspective of, say, the graphic designer for the ad campaign, it might very well be art.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Art is what you think it is.”

      Never lost an argument with that one.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But there are so many people who are so confident in saying things that easily fit the definition you propose are “not art”

      • thonofpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because there are many doesn’t mean they are right (I don’t mean to offend). Art, I believe, is not in the eye of the beholder, but in the thought of the creator.