Why won't they send in more NATO countries, after these months, to help Ukraine regain land from Russia? - eviltoast

It makes sense that they won’t allow their own skin to be ravaged (United States, Britain, Germany, France etc), but why not the Baltics and Poland, at this point?

I’m surprised they haven’t done so, after these long months

  • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because sending in a NATO country would start a new world war.

    And NATO has no interest in doing that, they just want Ukrainians to die for making Russia weaker.

    • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, we could say the same of the Korean War, but that didn’t stop the U.S from bombing the hell out of the DPRK…

      • olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        drpk tested it’s first nuke in the 2000’s, the us invaded in the 50’s thinking it would be a easy campaign since the country was recovering from japanese occupation, the general heading the campaign even fucking asked to deploy nukes on drpk

        • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even then, Socialist Russia and China were developing nukes that they could theoretically use on stand-by to counter U.S, not to say that they had necessarily planned for that all…