Legal experts warn of 'constitutional crisis' as JD Vance and Elon Musk question judges' authority over Trump - eviltoast

Summary

Legal experts warn of a looming constitutional crisis after JD Vance suggested judges lack authority over Trump’s “legitimate power.”

His remarks follow a federal judge’s ruling blocking Trump and Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing Treasury Department data.

Musk also called for the judge’s impeachment, fueling concerns the administration may ignore court orders.

Scholars argue this undermines judicial authority and could trigger a systemic breakdown, but with Republicans controlling Congress, impeachment as a remedy appears unlikely.

  • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m getting kinda tired of all these constitutional crisis, maybe one of the branches could start checking some of this bullshit. Just a thought.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Say, isn’t there an organization out there whose members all take an oath to defend the constitution from all threats, foreign and domestic? I wonder what that organization might have to say about something like this, can anyone get their thoughts?

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would be nice but congress is Republican controlled and for any court related stuff it could just go up to the supreme Court and be ruled Trump’s way. Or just flat out ignored cause who is gonna stop him if he just ignores court rulings.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ideally, the Dems should’ve pushed the security out of the way and physically removed the DOGE team and their hardware and software. Instead they performatively argued with a single private security guy blocking the doors. The Dems are already capitulating talking about letting the “blue dogs” vote with the GOP.

        I’d like to see a large amount of Dems in congress and in other high positions to take direct action, get arrested, and jailed. I think this would force hard conversations in the media about what’s going on, and courts and judges to more or less definitively rule.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        But the Constitution! Some people are having trouble coming to terms with the fact that our systems have allowed this takeover to happen and the path to get out of this is narrowing rapidly. I’d be surprised if 3 years from now we even recognize the US as it once was.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But the Constitution

          Remember when Republicans carried those vest pocket editions of the Constitution? They were keeping it at the ready for the time they could wipe their asses with it.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          The real interesting question to me is how do you even really prevent something like this from happening? If every elected official decides the law doesn’t matter who is left to enforce it on them? I feel like the only real options are the military stepping in when bad things are happening but that’s a very slippery slope to normalize that or having powerful unions that can actually lead general strikes when these kinds of things happen. But atleast in the US unions have been beaten down so much that that isn’t really an option so what is left really?

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            We are. There is an amendment for this. Its a funny one known as the second. But good luck with that, especially if the military is going along with it.

          • burgersc12@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think we have a couple of bad options

            1. live with it
            2. end civilization as we know it

            It’s like a rock and a hard place…

        • HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          By the end of 2025 the Us will be a christofacist theocracy if the non cult member don’t start a resistance really soon and yes that mean violence and probably a civil war but no peaceful way will stop them now

      • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m fully aware of the makeup of the Senate and the “it’s ok if it’s an official act, you can have little crime, as a treat” ruling by SOTUS. Our government is a house of cards built on a “gentleman’s agreement” to generally not be a dick.

        I’m just sick of it already. There’s a bird flu coming and the CDC cannot warn us about it and likely won’t be rolling out vaccines. There will only be lockdowns in the Blue states. Which will allow the strain to become more virulent in carrier populations in Red states. Tariffs are going to fuck over small businesses allowing for more venture capital buyouts and to top it all off Elon is capturing as much data as his grubby little paws can grasp.

        I don’t want to make this comment any longer as it’ll fuck up the thread for everyone else, but there’s resources in the comment below if any of y’all would like

        https://lemmy.world/comment/14977955

    • doctortofu@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Rookie mistake - you guys in the US thought “checks and balances” mean another thing, but it’s now clear as day that they actually refer to checks from billionaires and bank account balances…