Me who uses KDE default - eviltoast
  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    55·
    4 天前

    Very dumb question, but I’m kinda new to Linux. Do I have to manually update that or does it just do it when I update packages and the like? I’m on Arch btw.

        • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
          57·
          4 天前

          “I use Arch BTW” is a meme in the Linux community. It reflects the perceived urge of Arch users to boast about using it.

          Welcome to Linux :)

        • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
          2014·
          4 天前

          Then Arch is kind of a terrible choice for you. I use it (btw), but I’ve been using linux since 2008.

          The learning curve and constant need to troubleshoot things isn’t great for beginners.

          EDIT: can someone explain why I’m getting downvoted? Isn’t this common knowledge that Mint and other begginner-friendly distros that don’t have complicated package managers and require less configuration and maintenance are better for someone who’s just starting with Linux?

          I myself began with Ubuntu back in '08 but nowadays use both Arch and Mint.

          • TommySoda@lemmy.world
            22·
            4 天前

            That’s one of the reasons I chose arch. Because of the difficulty i can’t take shortcuts or be lazy and have to actually learn. When I tried something like Pop_OS I definitely enjoyed it but didn’t really learn anything because it was all done for me.

            • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
              3·
              4 天前

              Arch Linux can be a bit overwhelming for newbies when trying out for the first time. Hey if you are comfortable with it then so be it. But if you have tried other friendly distros before this you can get an understanding of different package managers, arch packages, AUR etc. And to answer the question if you installed KDE through pacman or AUR helper, then it will be updated automatically when you update other packages through it.

          • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
            5·
            4 天前

            What are y’all doing that you need to troubleshoot constantly? My experience with arch is about the same as my experience with Debian.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            1·
            3 天前

            I had way more struggle and frustration using mint/ubuntu than arch/endevourOS/openSuse TW

            🤷🏻‍♀️

            Using old kernel and mix of flatpak/repo/snap etc. Is just unpredictable, what happens and why. At least for me.

            I love, how in arch anything is verbose! Main reason I love linux and Arch especially.

    • 97xBang@feddit.onlineEnglish
      226·
      4 天前

      There’s no way you’re so new to Linux that you wouldn’t know if that would update automatically yet you’re running Arch btw. That’s like saying, “Do I need to do oil changes on my car? I built my engine, btw.”

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        21·
        3 天前

        all you have to do to “run” arch is type out some lines from a YouTube video and press enter. With all the people saying “Arch! Arch!” at every corner it’s totally understandable that someone would try it and still be confused on basic stuff.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        13·
        4 天前

        Nah, there’s a bunch of people (even on Lemmy) that recommend Arch or Arch-derived distributions to newbies. Many mention they haven’t used any other distro themselves.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
          2·
          2 天前

          People are nuts

          I once had someone tell me that they use Arch on there server since it is stable. If it works that is fine but don’t go around telling people that Arch is more stable than Ubuntu, Rocky or Debian.

        • 97xBang@feddit.onlineEnglish
          1·
          3 天前

          They would still have to go through that ridiculous install following the Wiki, so I think that they are be pretty well educated on updates.

          • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
            8·
            3 天前

            Depends. There’s also the included archinstall script, which skips all of that. Just some minimal configuration you find on most distros (Language/Time Zones/Mirrors…) and that’s it.

            So yeah, nowadays it’s totally possible to end up with a working Arch installation without knowing anything about it besides that one command.

      • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        6·
        3 天前

        Arch stereotype is over with archinstall and direct step by step tutorial. You don’t need to know how new release get updated to install arch

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzEnglish
      8·
      4 天前

      On linux, generally everything you install is through a centralized repository, you can think of it as an app store, arch is all entirely updated through pacman, pacman is just a command line way to interact with the app store.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      4·
      4 天前

      In general, almost everything you install with pacman will update when you do pacman -Syu (and restart, in case of kernel updates). The way packages work, all the files needed for a piece of software to function are installed from a package, and when you install a newer version, it removes all the files from the old version and puts in new ones. (Caveats apply to configuration files you can modify - those don’t get replaced if you do)

      So after you update some software through pacman, it should be in an entirely clean state, just like if you just installed it. The main caveats apply to things like flatpak, which manage its own packages, and software like Steam and Discord, which have an additional auto-updater for some things that’s storing files separately.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      1·
      3 天前

      With Arch pacman -Syu will do it for you. Generally you are encouraged to stick with the version in the repositories.

      You can install things from source by downloading the source code, building it (eg. gcc code.c or cargo build) and then copying the binary somewhere.

      Typically if you were going to install things from Source, you would write a pkgbuild for it and that would integrate it with pacman so you have a centralised manager of everything that you have installed to simplify updates and removal and conflicts etc.

      Doing this for small packages is pretty trivial and sometimes necessary. For a large package like KDE plasma It is a very large undertaking and you would never do it in practise.

      The maintainers package the desktop environment with a pkgbuild, test it, And then upload it so that you can use it.

      Also note that when the arch maintainers do package that software they compile it into a binary so you just have to download it. You don’t also have to build it.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      31·
      4 天前

      I am not sure if anyone answered your question in a way that you were expecting so let me try

      yes you will get the update but you might not know it because your config wont change, so you have to go into the theme settings and use the “default” to see the pretty

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      11·
      3 天前

      New to arch and new to Linux:

      Install a yogurt, or yet another one!

  • lemming741@lemmy.worldEnglish
    261·
    4 天前

    sudo apt install cool-package
    438 dependencies will need to download 1.4 gb ^C ^C ^C ^C ^C

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      2·
      2 天前

      I don’t even need to install any new packages to get that

      sudo zypper dup

      992 packages to upgrade, 2 to downgrade, 18 new, 3 to remove.

      Package download size: 1.81 GiB

      Half the packages are LibQT6something or LibKF6 something lol

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        4·
        4 天前

        I have tried both kde and gnome many times and i can’t stand either one. I’m forever stuck in cinnamon.

        somehow every distro that ships with kde has tons of big bugs that I can’t figure out (probably related to my setup), and gnome feels like a tablet UI. cinnamon won’t autosuspend but it’s the smallest headache of these…

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          4·
          4 天前

          Funny enough Cinnamon is Gnome 3 done right.

          And I agree gnome in general has its sore points, I’m just used to them.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
      1·
      2 天前

      Gnome on Debian is fairly out of date. I personally like all the new features.

      However, I think it would be cool if you could run Fedora with gnome in Podman. Solid base with containers for newer stuff.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        12·
        4 天前

        I don’t even know which version of GNOME I run anymore. I only notice when the GNOME devs remove some feature I used to use.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          4·
          4 天前

          Yeah, about the same. Honestly I’m in a state that I don’t really care even. GNOME does everything that I need it to while being very invisible and out of the way and I love it

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      1·
      2 天前

      I was running MATE door years before switching to Windows 8.1 and shortly after first public beta of Windows 10 when it was available. I was even helping translating it to Polish for like a month or two, but given that I was probably like B1 (about B2 right now) in English at that time it was probably not ideal, lol.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      1·
      3 天前

      Mate is really nice, I was always a fan. (Although XFCE is nice too). However, I dont believe it has support for Wayland yet?

      I think LXDE has Wayland now but I haven’t tried it.