The only plausible way for investors to get their money back on OpenAI is as if, as the company has been betting, OpenAI will soon develop AI systems that can do most work humans can do on a computer. - eviltoast
    • jrs100000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 天前

      AI agents that can replace humans are miles away, but AI that can improve human output isnt.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 天前

        Mmmmmmmm . . . Sort of kind of, to some extent.

        The trade-offs and fine-print and all the hidden steps and caveats to everything - it’s like at least 10 years too early, but the unfathomable hype frenzy means we’re going to get stick with something. A generalizing summary bot is - OK.

        If they can ever get it to not have to be double-checked every time it’d be more useful. But the fact is, AI simply doesn’t understand what words mean. Math is good, code is a sort-of in-between. Everything else is a crapshoot.