The Supreme Court seems eager to curb First Amendment protections for porn - eviltoast

Summary

The Supreme Court’s hearing of Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton signals potential limits on First Amendment protections for online pornography.

The case involves a Texas law mandating age verification for websites with “sexual material harmful to minors,” challenging the 2004 Ashcroft v. ACLU precedent, which struck down similar laws under strict scrutiny.

Justices, citing the inadequacy of modern filtering tools, seemed inclined to weaken free speech protections, exploring standards like intermediate scrutiny.

The ruling could reshape online speech regulations, leaving adults’ access to sexual content uncertain while tightening restrictions for minors.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    … will go to jail and be forced to carry the pregnancy to term, be billed for delivery services, and raise the kid on her own. Nothing screams “stable childhood” like the government forcing your kid on you as punishment for getting pregnant.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And then soon after CPS will be called and they’ll take away the kid and I don’t even want to think about where they’ll send them.