Is it worth investing if I can only contribute $50 a month? - eviltoast

Assuming I have a time horizon >10 years.

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    As much as I hate to send you to Reddit, the r/personalfinance flowchart is hard to beat for most people. I’d recommend you start there to make sure you’re not overlooking something like your emergency fund.

    Reddit’s r/personalfinance flowchart for personal income

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        For the most part you can follow it. Pay down debts, save what you can, make a budget but it gets wonky when you hit 401K, IRA and healthcare

        Problem is each country in the EU is different. What works for Germany may not work for the Netherlands or Denmark.

        As an Aussie I substituted it’s and 401K with our pension equivalent called Superannuation. The healthcare is different in AU. Here in Europe it isn’t too different to AU, replace 401K and IRA are private pension or one offered through an employer.

      • IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I looked around a bit, and while I couldn’t find a drawn flowchart for the EU, r/EUpersonalfinance has a page on their wiki inspired by(links to it too) the US flowchart and accompanying text. I hate to plug reddit as well, but here is the link.

        spoiler

        https://www.reddit.com/r/eupersonalfinance/wiki/basics/#wiki_general_graphical_version

        (I’m not near a desktop, so can’t really copy and paste the info here with functional hyperlinks.)

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Link is broken for me when I try opening it in a new tab. Something is up with imgur.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is there a reason to focus on 401k (beyond the employer match) before HSA? Isn’t HSA more tax savings advantageous, even if just limited to health care expenses?

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not certain why they have HSA after 401k and IRA, but some possible things I can think of:

        • HSAs can be harder to take advantage of of the triple tax benefit if you’re retiring early (that is, still younger and healthier)
        • HSAs probably have worse investment options than an IRA
        • Allowing the user to optimize their Roth vs Traditional mix

        Again, I don’t really know because you’re right about the HSA triple tax advantage making it seem better than IRA or 401k, but I’m sure there was a reason given if you care to trawl the subreddit.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      hard to beat for most people.

      *Utterly irrelevant for most people

      Sorted that for you. What the hell is 401k, Roth, medical debt?

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Financial advice will always be intrinsically linked to fiscal advice, and that will vary with jurisdiction. Where I live we have no 401k or medical debt, but we have other debt and investment instruments with preferential tax treatment.

        The main line of the flow chart is sound.