Is it worth investing if I can only contribute $50 a month? - eviltoast

Assuming I have a time horizon >10 years.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Is there a reason to focus on 401k (beyond the employer match) before HSA? Isn’t HSA more tax savings advantageous, even if just limited to health care expenses?

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m not certain why they have HSA after 401k and IRA, but some possible things I can think of:

      • HSAs can be harder to take advantage of of the triple tax benefit if you’re retiring early (that is, still younger and healthier)
      • HSAs probably have worse investment options than an IRA
      • Allowing the user to optimize their Roth vs Traditional mix

      Again, I don’t really know because you’re right about the HSA triple tax advantage making it seem better than IRA or 401k, but I’m sure there was a reason given if you care to trawl the subreddit.