Kamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics. - eviltoast
  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Funny. I was told that was a false dichotomy before the most recent election too.

    Somehow I just continue being proved right. This is my cross to bear.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      wow, dogshit party will get elected in the hitlerite country, amazing insight, I can see why you get paid the big bucks

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Cherry picking, I said it was an appeal to futility, as well as a false dichotomy. There’s plenty of other outcomes besides one of the two warmonger parties winning- like elections get cancelled due to Biden launching nukes on Jan 6 '25 to stop the steal. Just because one of the shitty parties is obviously going to win it’s still a worthwhile endeavor to oppose them, rather than just accepting whatever garbage they serve up.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yeah and a giant meteor could crush me tonight in my sleep.

            Anyway, see you tomorrow.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I can understand why you as one of the primary beneficiaries of a system of exploitation would be reluctant to upend it, but it seems it has removed any capacity to imagine a better outcome, let alone work towards it.

              Those who don’t move don’t notice their chains.