Magic Lasso suggests that Chrome might be the new IE - eviltoast
Is Chrome the new IE? – Magic Lasso Adblock
www.magiclasso.co
With a global browser market share of over 65%, Google’s Chrome has become the target of criticism and disdain, much like Microsoft’s Internet Explorer once was. Is Chrome facing similar challenges to Internet Explorer (IE) and will this lead to its downfall?

Bloated and complacent, Chrome might be on the path to playing the same role as IE was playing 15 years ago, shunned by developers and technologically inferior to other browsers.

    • Libb@jlai.lu
      102·
      1 day ago

      They chose Chromium. Which is the base for Chrome (and all other relevant browsers).

      I know we live in a time of why-give-a-fuck-about-facts, but I see two ‘relevant browsers’ in the top ranking that are not chromium-based:

      Chrome 66.68%
      Safari 18.07%
      Edge 5.25%
      Firefox 2.65%

      (https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share)

      • sibachian@lemmy.mlEnglish
        52·
        24 hours ago

        and out of those 4, 3 are based on a fork that came originally from khtml. so it’s really just firefox that matters in this race. well, until ladybird is ready.

        • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
          6·
          23 hours ago

          https://ladybird.org/

          Well that’s cool

          Ladybird is a brand-new browser & web engine. Driven by a web standards first approach, Ladybird aims to render the modern web with good performance, stability and security.

          Singular focus

          We are focused on one thing: the web browser.

          No monetization

          No “default search deals”, crypto tokens, or other forms of user monetization, ever.

          Announcing the Ladybird Browser Initiative

          Launching our 501©(3) nonprofit.

          Looking forward to it, 2026 feels like a long ways away but I imagine there is lots to do before then

      • ShieldGengar@sh.itjust.works
        12·
        18 hours ago

        Your source is missing a bunch of chromium-based browsers to add up to 100%, and there’s no methodology or statistics explanation.

        • Libb@jlai.lu
          7·
          18 hours ago

          Your source is missing a bunch of chromium-based browsers to add up to 100%, and there’s no methodology or statistics explanation.

          FFS… I listed the first four results of the first web search result I got. Also, may I remind you that me quoting only the four first results (unfiltered) of a longer list doesn’t change a thing on the ranking: on those 4 firsts (aka, the browsers occupying the 1st to the 4th places, aka the ones ranked before the 5th, 6th places and so on), two of them are not Chromium-based. That’s all I was saying.

          For the rest:

          1. Feel free to quote other sources, obviously. I would be happy to see other numbers with some more of that ‘methodology or statistics explanation’ you’re talking about.
          2. Have a nice day.
        • Libb@jlai.lu
          91·
          1 day ago

          Is it that hard to read a four entries list without skipping half of them to try to prove your point?

          Safari and Firefox are not chromium-based.