ylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoWindows 11 just isn't enticing Windows 10 users to upgrade, and its market share is actually fallingwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square259fedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down116
arrow-up1867arrow-down1external-linkWindows 11 just isn't enticing Windows 10 users to upgrade, and its market share is actually fallingwww.pcgamer.comylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square259fedilink
minus-squareNaoPblinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agoIf you include 98SE you should also include 8.1. Or include neither. But then it wouldn’t make sense anymore.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·8 months agoXP SP2 is what everyone remembers, too. It wasn’t very good at release and a lot of people stayed on 2000.
minus-squareSaik0@lemmy.saik0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoIndeed. Plug and play didn’t (mostly) get figured out until SP2. Drivers were still quite a nightmare at that time. 2000 though was a server version. Not technically consumer.
minus-squareNaoPblinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI’ve honestly haven’t had any problems with XP SP1. I’ve had it on a couple computers back in the day. I remember that the upgrade to SP2 wouldn’t always go well. Sometimes requiring a reinstall.
If you include 98SE you should also include 8.1. Or include neither. But then it wouldn’t make sense anymore.
XP SP2 is what everyone remembers, too. It wasn’t very good at release and a lot of people stayed on 2000.
Indeed. Plug and play didn’t (mostly) get figured out until SP2. Drivers were still quite a nightmare at that time.
2000 though was a server version. Not technically consumer.
I’ve honestly haven’t had any problems with XP SP1. I’ve had it on a couple computers back in the day. I remember that the upgrade to SP2 wouldn’t always go well. Sometimes requiring a reinstall.