@the_abecedarian - eviltoast

CrocodilloBombardino

  • 7 Posts
  • 182 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • If we’re just talking Congress, they’ll probably just gridlock most laws from passing without repealing much of anything.

    For the presidency (+Congress maybe) I imagine they would scrap the tariffs and try to re-assert the US’ position as global cop/guarantor of European security. Maybe restart some USAID type programs and end the DEI purge. Some EV tax credits and subsidies for offshore wind and solar power might return. I think the BBB funding for ice would stay in place bc they have been moving right on immigration for years. I kinda doubt they’d regulate crypto much harder, but it remains to be seen. We’ll have to see who ends up the nominee and the dems will try to get the most run of the mill establishment candidate they can get.

    I’m interested to see what they will even try with the changes doge made. Years later, will they put forth the effort to undo them and rebuild a professional bureaucracy? I imagine a good number of the cuts will continue.

    No matter what, they will be very hemmed in by the supreme court. Real change comes from below.



















  • If your passive income is rent, meaning you’re a landlord, then yes you should get a real job instead.

    Otherwise, this seems like a real difference in values between you two. If you feel secure now and for the foreseeable future, then it’s a perfectly valid choice not to want to try and climb into a new economic class. If you’re just comfortable for now, with no real retirement savings/emergency fund, then it makes sense for her to worry about the long term finances. If you can choose any route to “develop yourself” (e.g. become an artist or writer, do community organizing, do engineering projects), and the requirement is not necessarily to make more money, then I would view that as a push to get you out of complacency and distraction, which wouldn’t be as bad.


  • I am generally skeptical of anyone who considers themself “anti-woke” or who complains about “wokeness” as wanting to have a sincere conversation about these things. I imagine in 99% of cases, it’ll be more likely that they complain about corporate wokeness because they simply don’t want to see representations of happy, successful lgbtqia+ people and people of color in mainstream culture, even if it’s just marketing. Maybe test the waters by making a similar point about the companies that market themselves based on pandering to the right and see how enthusiastically they agree about how bad corporate cooptation of culture is. At least then, you can say “and the same goes for corporations pandering to the left!”

    Still, the fact that seeing a bunch of rainbow logos actually bothers these people for reasons other than being sick of capitalist cooptation of liberatory movements would not give me much hope that that line of argument will be meaningful to them.