sircac

The main point is to be able to handle uncertainties in a normal basis, the greyness of reality, despite the temptation of blacks and whites of our minds.

For sure it costs a lot. The consideration of the superposition of possible truths and the weight of potential biases is a huge burden without granted full coverage, but allows you to accumulate a landscape of plausibility of things: yes, is not 100% precise and is still built by personal prejudices but, with a systematic acceptance of new bits of information regardless of how comfortable they are, it can grow a mostly reliable understanding of reality with a variable amount of temporary uncertainty on some facts… and you can still convert greys into quasi-b&w once they reach a decent amount of independent evidences, you now, to free a bit your RAM.

PS: Peer review is neither 100% perfect, is just more solid.

Yeah, “probably” will have exceptions, but in general are easily abused resources IMHO

…at the moment

The wrong migration to IMHO…

Jump scares are a bit like added public laughs on sitcoms, if you need them to make it work then probably is mediocre…

Well, when the loop takes place there is a travel in time taking place… but not as in the standard time travel films.

I think is important to point out that in the Groundhog time loops the travel is only of the memories or the information, there is no energy-mass traveling (though information is a kind of energy, let me skip physics here), and the traveler at the beginning of the loop has not carried anything from the future but the memories of the previous loop, did not age or suffered physical modifications (there may be exceptions, sure).

So I think that is a kind of time travel, but a sub-genre where the travel is less material than in the typical time travels.

In the end, there can be only one

Ma cuanto mi manca Italia…

I have terrible difficulties to enjoy those anime that require irreal coloured hair stiles and eccentric complements to distinguish the characters…

Recently I felt a bit of freshness with an anime, which faces I do not find “beautiful” or well drawn at all, but they were all quite distinguishable without the need of weird coloured hair… Dead Dead Demon’s Dededede Destruction, despite the cartoonish style for once in a while I was glad to not see an endless amount of plain “beautiful” stereotyped faces…

I cannot avoid to be pedantic on this, it is recharged during half the trip… it just does not require plug-like recharging

I really would love to be able to tag this kind of beings capable of such actions in a way that I can recognise them when I find them out there in person, not for violence of any kind against them, a % of humans are alike and may be useful for certain tasks, but to take informed decision about with whom prioritise my altruism or any social collective benefit: I may share this planet with them, but I will never call them my people.

I don’t care, I just want a nice place to wander, nothing is forever, but the longer, the better, regardless of popularity

rule 34

deleted by creator

Since I started to watch Uzumaki (anime adaptation) I see spirals everywhere with an unsettling vibe every time…

Since I started to watch Uzumaki (anime adaptation) I see spirals everywhere with an unsettling vibe every time…

Since I started to watch Uzumaki (anime adaptation) I see spirals everywhere with an unsettling vibe every time…

“To shoehorn something” is a literal common expression in Spanish, lately often used to indicate a deliberated misdirection of a debate into a different argument at the minimum occasion (usually via any fallacy)… and there are even shoehorns literally with long sticks for the elders…

Look what you make me do to you

…serving in a McDonalds?