Nyt hired a person who’d never been a journalist to provide coverage of Palestine. They had already liked tweets and shit that called Palestinians barbaric scum. And the reporter hired her cousin to provide reports from Israel. She then produced the vast majority of the coverage calling the Oct 7th attack and giant rape campaign by Hamas. Recently the intercept double checked her work and discovered that the original nyt story has no sources backing up its claim, it was all invented wholesale. They did discover that the author had tried to find sources or evidence of the mass rapes and repeatedly been unable to prove it. They still went with the story. Nyt knew this because their own shitty daily news podcast (the daily) wanted to run the story too, but they couldn’t get any sources on the claims of mass rapes on Oct 7 either. Nyt is still backing the claims made in the original piece and the author.
That pretty much it, terrible journalism and they know it but it pushes the narrative the policy makers want so it goes out regardless of merit or truth.
It also allows them to alter the perception of refugees fleeing hostile governments from South America, as lazy bums who want to fuck up America by traveling over 4000 miles across mountains and rivers to get to America. Americans cannot be allowed to learn the reasons why these people fleeing South America, to learn that their governments were destabilized so that bananas could remain cheap, or so that oil prices wouldn’t become cheap, or anything other myriad of pretzel shapes Cia spooks will create to justify their crimes against humanity.