@rbn - eviltoast
  • 3 Posts
  • 237 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 30th, 2024

help-circle

  • I don’t know about the US but in Germany the context of things is definitely considered to judge if something is common or suspicious.

    It’s perfectly legal to own a clown mask and to wear it during carnival would be common. If you wear one outside carnival and walk towards the door of a bank, that’s pretty suspicious.

    It’s perfectly legal to stand around in public. If you do it alone, at night in an area that’s known to have many drug dealers and you suddenly start to run away if the police strolls along, then that’s suspicious again.

    And if the police considers you to be suspicious, they will ask what you’re doing and to explain your behavior. They won’t straight away throw you into jail obviously but they have the right to do a routine check.

    For me, the cash in a regular package is really similar. If they seize your cash and you can proof that it was a weird way to pay for a car or that your aunt forgot her pile of cash when she visited you and you send it after her, then I’m quite sure, they’ll have to hand it back. If you object to explain who sent you $10.000 and why, then I agree to find that pretty suspicious.

    Assuming criminals do use FedEx etc. to transfer illegally earned money anonymously from one place to another, what would be the alternative to intervene? Or would you just let it happen?


  • Okay, valid point. But is the police seizing such packages? If we assume the police is stealing it out of greed, that wouldn’t be too profitable for them to steal 5 USD in Zimbabwe dollars.

    I thought they’re confiscating cash with a higher value, like bundlSe of USD/CAD/EUR/AUD etc. In the article they wrote 6 million USD and on the picture I see only US notes as well. And if that’s the case, I somewhat agree that that’s a bit suspicious.

    Still, they shouldn’t just take and keep it, but if they confiscate it and then contact the recipient to explain the background of the transaction, I’d be fine with that.

    If you carry large amounts of cash on a flight you also have provide reason and papertrail for that.



  • Ich finde den Preis immernoch enorm wichtig, wenn man auch Leute mit Auto erreichen will. Wenn man nur gelegentlich mal einen Bus oder eine Bahn nimmt, sind 49€ nicht attraktiv. Und Einzeltickets sind leider oft genauso teuer oder sogar teurer als die Kosten einer Fahrt mit dem Auto, wenn Wertverlust, Versicherung etc. sowieso anfallen.

    Beim 9€ Ticket haben plötzlich super viele Leute in meinem Umfeld einen Hybridansatz gewählt, bei 49€ fahren die meisten wieder nur noch Auto. Nur ÖPNV ist preislich zwar billiger als nur Auto aber für viele einfach schwierig vorstellbar bzw. nur mit großen Mobilitätseinbußen möglich.

    Mit kostenlosem oder stark subventionierten ÖPNV gibt man sowohl den Autofahrern als auch den Verkehrsbetrieben die Möglichkeit, allmählich zusammenzuwachsen. Mehr Leute nutzen es immer öfter, es werden mehr Verbindungen hinzugefügt, dann fahren wieder mehr usw.


  • Yeah, makes sense in the end even though it’s hard to grasp for me. Especially if the object on top is freely rolling and therefore feels somewhat decoupled to me. I imagined the train below the bike to behave like a tablecloth pulled from underneath a glass and where the glass keeps in the same place thanks to inertia.

    But coming back to my initial statement, if the train’s movement doesn’t impact the point of landing, does it increase the difficulty for the stunts? Or is it more for the nice effect in the video?









  • rbn@sopuli.xyztovegan@lemmy.worldRecent happenings
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think that’s an adequate reaction. Thank you for taking action and being transparant about it.

    As a member of this community for quite some time, the past couple of days felt really weird to me. Instead of peaceful and (from my perspective) valuable communication between vegans and non-vegans, the mood changed to a radical, almost war-like athmosphere. I was not among those being banned but I had several discussions where suddenly loads of other, completely normal posts were deleted.

    I think this community should be open for other opinions. Everyone who’d like to engage in a respectful way - vegan or not - should be welcomed. I think the target should be to have a ‘pro-vegan community’ and not a ‘hardline anti everything that is even remotely non-vegan’.







  • Does anyone know how they define junk food in that guideline? Is it based on calories / fat / sugar? Or do they have a specific list of products that are now forbidden in ads? Or a list of companies? Does the ban include product placements (like a kids movie where a family goes to McD? What about ‘normal’ content about fast food (like SpongeBob making krabby burgers)?

    I really appreciate the law but I think it can be quite challenging to draw the line between legal and illegal.