I think this is called aposiopesis
I think this is called aposiopesis
Note that it speaks of the “official version” in the next sentence, which seems to me like there will be inofficial versions which requires a more permissive license
But we’ll see
deleted by creator
Yeah, that’s confusing to read. A hashset can only contain at most one of each cheese kind, in c++20 you can write inventory.contains(cheeseName)
, before that you had to use .count
or inventory.find(cheeseName) != inventory.end()
or something like that
Exactly, raw pointers are very rarely the way to go
Noo! There will never be another like him :(
Well, that happens sometimes
Klingt lustig, hast du eine Verknüpfung?
Please learn some math before making more blatantly incorrect statements. Quoting yourself as a source is… an interesting thing to do.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_property
I did read the answers, try doing that yourself.
I don’t know what you’re on about with your distributive law thing. That just states that a*(b + c) = a*b + a*c
, and has literally no relation to notation.
And “math is never ambiguous” is a very bold claim, and certainly doesn’t hold for mathematical notation. For some simple exanples, see here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1024280/most-ambiguous-and-inconsistent-phrases-and-notations-in-maths#1024302
Oder einfach nur als pdf, ohne ausdrucken, kann man ja trotzdem am handy vorzeigen
Ja, nur “c km/h” ist so ähnlich wie “5 km/h km/h”, denn c ist nicht nur eine zahl, sondern beinhaltet bereits eine einheit. Korrekt sollte man also “120km/h - c” schreiben. Ist aber völlig egal.
But be careful, you can pretty easily break stuff by messing up fstab
Wer sind die abgebildeten Personen?
What does type() mean here?
The effective vibe is much more important than any underlying biology.
Tomatoes are vegetables.
I love how the text seems to be right from the time where the symbol was already abstract, but it was still used as an et ligature instead of a standalone symbol