No, it’s Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

Thanks for elaborating. I’ll keep that in mind moving forward when posting to this sub. I have noticed that people tend to respond positively to more traditional photos and negatively to abstraction. But there are specific subs for posting those images so it’s not a big deal.

If you are at all interested in abstract photography, there are plenty of artists to look at. There’s Man Ray, Aaron Siskind, and Edward Weston. It started gaining in popularity in the late 1800s / early 1900s with the Abstract Expressionist movement and on through Cubism and Futurism.

Thanks for the comment. I also like finding those everyday moments.I enjoy discovering easily ignored details of everyday life. I’ve lived in this space for awhile and don’t remember noticing this pattern on the wall.

Thanks for the reply. I appreciate your feedback and your decision to delete mean sounding opinions and instead leave a critique of the work. And yes, I value critique of my work.

I’m wondering if you could elaborate on what makes it bland and amateurish. Are you reacting to the overall composition, the subtle contrast, or the lack of an obvious subject? Or maybe all of those or none of those things? I feel the photo is comparable to the subtleties of light and shadow of Astronomatopoeia 029 and 008 and taken with a similar artistic eye while 012 and 005 are definitely spontaneous snapshots. Astronomatopoeia 025 is similar only as minimal subject matter but dissimilar as abstracted space.

Yes, I suppose it is. Sunlight from two different windows created the hotspot shapes and shadows where the ceiling and wall meet. Your use of the word ‘just’ implies criticism of the piece. What do you think of the photograph?

I apologize for the delay… I was sick for a while and now on the mend.

‘Astronomatopoeia’ is a made up portmanteau combining ‘astronomy’ and ‘onomatopoeia’. It’s also a catch-all name for the random (semi) daily black and white photos I take.

When walking around my neighborhood, I often look up at the clouds and tree tops and I like the way that bare tree branches look against the sky. It’s as if there are cracks forming at the base of the atmosphere.

I also imagine the windshield of my car is a camera’s view finder with the edges of the car composing a shot. With these parameters I have to further compose the image and choose the most interesting part.

Taking all this into account, sound plays a huge role in my attitude, thought process, and approach to photography or art making. Whether it’s music, silence, or the ambient environmental sounds, it affects the way I think, which in turn, affects what I make.

Observation + sound = random photo named Astronomatopoeia

?

Close

Thanks! This is an image from late last year when I was experimenting with different pixel sorting, glitch, and tilt shift apps. Before then, I was “glitching” images manually using layers in Photoshop, Krita, and Glimpse. If you want to see more, Strictly Arbitrary is on my Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/joshuawmurray/

Thanks!

Thanks!

No worries! I appreciate the explanation. It’s a monochrome digital image with a light sepia toned filter applied at the time I took the photo. It’s not a true black and white photograph and there aren’t any tags for sepia, monochrome, Van Dyke, etc. so I tagged it black and white. I suppose I could start #monochrome .

Would you prefer monochrome?

Would you prefer monochrome?

It’s just like how it sounds.

Signed!