Your address book is uploaded to Facebook servers when you use Whatsapp. And each time you interact, they know with who and link this information with other profiles and users of the Meta products.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
jjdelc@lemmy.mlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Is Brave Browser currently as privacy disrespecting as some say?2·2 years agoAnd it is because of these lousy developers that live inside a Google world that people don’t want to use Firefox.
They aren’t E2EE so all messages and activity are recorded. They are subject to to very different rules than regular chats or groups.
jjdelc@lemmy.mlto UKCasual@lemmy.world•Monday: What have you got lined up this week?English2·2 years agoOppenheimer on Imax this Wednesday, parties on Friday and Saturday.
I used influencers as an example, that’s true that they’re everywhere. But there’s many communities I follow that don’t care about Twitter politics, and they got little interest or even information to consider moving elsewhere.
The analogy of simply choosing different software doesn’t apply here. Because I can switch my os or calculator app. Those choices don’t depend on other people. Sadly, we still depend on being able to read content that other parties we care for still publish on Twitter even though I disagree with it as a to. Maybe they do or dont care. I can disagree with Twitter and like my influencers. For that, something like nitter is a good step in the direction. I want to move. As muchas I’d like to snap my fingers and have everyone into my network of personal choice. It cannot happen.
jjdelc@lemmy.mlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Google engineers want to introduce DRMs for web pages, making ad-blocking near-impossible in the browserEnglish3·2 years agoI feel that rather than DRM being illegal, Google and Chromium browsers having monopoly on the web is what allows these crazy ideas to have any room.
If the browser market was more evenly spread and there were more parties involved, these ideas woldn’t fly so easily.
jjdelc@lemmy.mlto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Does existence of a language authority influence opinions about descriptivism/prescriptivism?2·2 years agoI Spanish, the Real academia de la lengua is often used incorrectly by people as a prescriptive reference but what they really do is gather the common usages and incorporate them into the language. It’s like a descriptive record of language.
They treat this as if e2ee was the privacy grail but it’s only marketing to fool people believing they’re protected.
The actual contents of the messages aren’t as important for privacy. It’s the Metadata and a ton of other measures rhay signal implements in their family of protocols.
Talking about e2ee and call it private shows ignorance in what privacy entails.