My benign Reddit hug of death

China’s malicious censorship of data

lol lmao even

Considering Chinese companies like Tiktok have been more than happy to sign agreements where data is only transmitted and hosted in the US, with US DoD oversight…

This only works assuming Russia is indefinitely sanctioned… So, either we’ve just signed ourselves into a second Cold War, or the taxpayer will be responsible for repayment.

Considering that SinoVac was approved for use June 1st, 2021 and Biden was inaugurated January 20th, 2021…

Why hide covert actions if nobody cares?

Lmao this community is full of people who deepthroat the State Department and thank Blinken for the privilege.

Ironically, if she had used a Chinese hashtag she would’ve been fine. The state’s case hinges on #MeToo being a US-backed movement, just like #Pride.

LGBT and women’s rights activists in China are restricted from using foreign iconography and foreign slogans, but not from demonstrating. It’s absurd, but altogether a different issue than what the article makes it out to be.

Oh look it’s the consequences of my actions

Call me when Zen 5 launches. Zen 3 is one generation behind AMD’s current flagship.

Please recall that Patten was the same person who went from:

Russian soldiers are supplied with Viagra to rape Ukrainian women and ‘dehumanize’ them, claims UN official

Russia using rape as ‘military strategy’ in Ukraine: UN envoy

to

No solid evidence of rape accusations against Russia, admits UN official

Patten has a history of misrepresenting reality to spread a political agenda. With that context in mind, I’ll be taking a closer look at the “evidence” Patten uses to make her claims. Are her sources reliable? Are her sources unbiased? Is there forensic data?

Yeah, that’s probably fair. The scale of the US intervention may have been different, though.

You think the NYT played no role in drumming up public support for an otherwise incredibly unpopular foreign policy decision? Here’s a report by FAIR: https://fair.org/home/20-years-later-nyt-still-cant-face-its-iraq-war-shame/

These mistakes led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands. How much more genocide apologism do you want to do?

You’re saying… A member of BRICS is an unreliable source of news for news about BRICS membership?

Edit: That Venezuela and Iran, two nations who are undoubtedly friendly with each other, make inaccurate statements about what each others’ leaders are saying? This is Iran reporting on a statement by Maduro about joining BRICS. That is the news.

“oh no! hackers learned how to hack in… public universities! The horror of PRC-sponsored hacking!”

I agree on this. For better or for worse, the NYT is representative of US news media to the world.

These are some of the most important and impactful stories since 2000. If the NYT can’t keep their journalism robust for these, what does it say about everything else?

Oh wait, we already know: “Palestinian family collides with bullet discharged from Israeli weapon”

EU bans China cotton imports for “human rights”

EU shocked when China ends cotton exports to the EU and the EU can’t produce gunpowder (which needs cotton)

I know this may seem unusual, but actions have consequences

Literally any outlet that doesn’t spin bullshit sources to justify warmongering?

Any outlet that doesn’t get an ex-IDF official to write an article on Israel’s war against Palestine?

Just basic journalistic integrity.

After the fact, it’s being revealed that their “sources” are consistently wrong and consistently in line with US foreign policy objectives.

You can say it’s a coincidence, but…