In general, if we have universal ID’s, then it makes sense… There are a segment of the poor that just don’t have ID, and it currently adversely affects one party more than the other.

Once you require ID, then republicans start adding roadblocks and requirements that make it tougher for classes of people.

On top of all that, it is an attempt to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. Non-citizens are not attempting to vote.

Most of the super rich don’t make their Monday through wages.

Certainly they must make their Tuesday through wages?

I watched the whole video… Mowed down like 90 deer in a row.

He’s not planning to get that far… Just needs the optics a few weeks before the election and then, win or lose, will drop the case without going through discovery.

Love the CX-50…

I acknowledge the cell connectivity in the car costs Mazda money to keep running. Most cars with that kind of connectivity charge for it. But, I think 10/month is too much.

Absolutely, but let’s not make it worse by putting the presidential election behind it… It’s bad enough it causes an imbalance in the House of Representatives. It would be far worse than the Electoral College.

Districts open things up to gerrymandering…

My bad, I looked up Western Samoa and got redirected to regular Samoa not American Samoa…

Hopefully the Kender is not too angry and won’t “borrow” all my stuff.

I’ll give that a shot… Does that mean the US also owns much of Europe and any country in the UN?

Also not part of the US

I only need 1.21 gigawatts…

Western Samoa is no longer… And how is it part of the US?

The “median” should cover that unless the super rich are over 50% of the population.

California does not depend on Almonds, it only accounts for 1/4 of 1% of the California economy.

In the US, the experience differs drastically, but you only see the long lines in the news… My location has short lines, old retirees running the polls.

It differs by state, mine is 7am to 8pm in addition to the preceding 2 weeks for early voting.

Forget symmetry, was there a relevant call to action in this case? An explicit call to action is definitely required for criminal liability…

Results are not relevant for proof unless they verbally requested that people call in bomb threats.

That seems like good evidence for a manslaughter charge… It doesn’t address motive at all, though, so wouldn’t be enough to upgrade the charge.

International and UK law are similar in this regard…