@hedgetank - eviltoast
  • 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • I mean, yes, I agree, but I’m curious as to what exactly the structures are, too. If we’re talking about an average “shoot house” type range, where it’s just a bunch of walls built to resemble a building, beefed up to properly stop and contain bullets, or some other similar “structure”, sure, going after him over the lack of a permit for it is legal, but seems like it’s being done more as a means of nickel and diming him with every technicality because new neighbors are NIMBYs than because there’s a legitimate issue


  • So, sure, go after him for the buildings if they didn’t have a permit to build, since that’s a potential safety hazard you don’t need when handling firearms.

    However, if the neighbors of the property came in after the property was made a gun range, then I have zero sympathy for them in terms of the noise since, to me, it’s no different than building a house near an industrial factor or a railroad or a highway: It was already there, the noise would’ve been expected, and if you chose to do it anyway, well, that’s on you, not on the range/factory/railroad/highway/whatever.


  • I’m a gunsmith and an avid competitive shooter, and I absolutely think that mandatory training with firearms should be necessary. Right now, it’s mandatory to take a hunter’s safety course before you can obtain a hunting license, which includes firearms safety. In sane states, obtaining a permit to carry a firearm loaded in public (concealed, we won’t get into the idiocy of open carry) requires similar training.

    To me, it’s no different than operating a vehicle or any other piece of equipment that has the potential to do great harm to others: You need to have training on how to use it properly and safely, the basics of the law and so on, and ultimately a level of enforced accountability in the event that you fail to follow protocols for safe handling, storage, and usage of said same.