Well, thing is women have smaller hands than men on average, and they do make up 50% of the population.

Damn you really think that only your vision is the acceptable one. To the point where your “argument” devolves into insulting those that don’t see it like you do.

Stop it. Get some help.

Forcing a whole table full of people to deliberately be ignorant and pretend to “discover” things that they already know isn’t fun, it’s tedious

That’s like, your opinion man.

Seriously, that is an opinion yet you write it as a general truth. Please don’t do that. There are tables that enjoy the role-playing aspect more, including “my character wouldn’t know that”. I would know, I’m part of one table like that.

Way I heard this joke, it continues with:

A real customer enters.

He asks where the toilets are.

The bar explodes.

you could argue semantically

No. There’s nothing to argue there, it’s the definition of OCR.

Also, do you believe that LLMs found a new, novel way of doing OCR? That’s not how they work, LLMs don’t invent, they don’t innovate, they’re simply unable to do that. What they do, when they work correctly, is that they use already known and established techniques and tools. So to quote your top comment in this chain:

Skill issue

Here in North America small-ish bottles will usually contain like 50 pills. Can be 100. Then there are the bigger bottles, like 500 pills in one. All OTC.

You’re reading text from a picture. That is OCR.

That was a good read, thank you!

Well I was wrong, thank you for educating me. That list is a bit disappointing…

Could you show an example? GOG has no DRM, for any game. That’s kind of their thing. I was wrong, there’s a full list.

There isn’t much of the brand that is Canadian anymore, it’s all Chinese owned. So unfortunately I don’t believe that reasonable take is the actual one.

Appreciate the sentiment, but rule 1 of the community states that you should keep the original title when submitting an article, using the body or a comment to put your commentary.

Got it, a xenophobic bigot. I won’t engage further, you’re not worth it. I encourage others to simply block you, as I’m doing right now.

So if I understand you correctly, you’re saying that him being a Muslim makes it inevitable that he will apply Sharia law (or something equivalent) to NYC?

Just say the racist thing you’re only implying, for all of us to see.

I’m unable to visualize things in my mind, are you actually saying that it means I cannot self reflect? That’s certainly a take… Also one that is not presented in the aphantasia article you linked, so I wonder where this jump in logic came from.

Feels like you just don’t know what aphantasia is, even though you linked an article about it. And what’s this “aphantasia from the inner self”?

As said by another, no need to offer the service worldwide, no need to be competitive, just need not to give them our data. It will cost a lot yes, but I’d much rather that than giving freely all our data to a fascist government and a kowtowing corporation.

Also nice moving of the goalposts, you first said that the article’s title was deceptive, “because the datacenters are in Canada”. I maintain my claim that this changes absolutely nothing to the story.

What does that change? It’s still property of Microsoft, and they’ve stated quite recently that US law will override any notion of sovereignty or ownership. So the datacenters could be anywhere, the data is, for all intents and purposes, american.

Well, the thing is, you just admitted that your initial comment about Firefox being more vulnerable was based on nothing, since you did your research only after. Then you so quickly went over the data you looked for that you only saw that total that seemed to confirm your unfounded bias, where the tables have that very readable color code to them, making 2015 and 2016 really jump to the eye.

Of course, now that the data you found goes against your bias, you just look to discredit it, instead of thinking “you know, maybe this isn’t as clear-cut as I thought it was”.

So no, no charity there. I’ll keel it for those who act in good faith, thank you.

For starters, if I had not called you out, you wouldn’t have provided sources. So my point still stands, your previous message, unsourced, was fear mongering.

Onto your data. Funny that you wrote the total from 2015, not mentioning that 127 of those code execution vulns are from 2015 and 2016… So 8 code exec since 2017, versus 85 for Chrome. I don’t think we can attribute that only to market share.

Either you don’t know how to read a table, or you purposefully ignored that part, perhaps hoping no-one would click on your links?