Throwing around the term Nazi doesn’t add cred to your argument
Throwing around the term Nazi doesn’t add cred to your argument
Sorry, was just trying to give context.
Hamas allegedly used paragliders to attack Israel, but the reporting about it is weird.
Ever heard of ants
Downvoted because dont
I bet his plan involves little boys
“Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.”
This is the part I disagree with. People are very often misled by bogus clickbait headlines.
Not when most people just read the headlines, and the headlines are often biased and misleading
There’s a whole life you can live outside of the internet
Well you said it has zero evidence, which implies you read it
You comments suggested it, again, did you pay to read the article or you just read the abstract?
Wait so did you read the article or not
Statics? They teaching yall physics?
I read this on the internet (maybe erowid? Lol) forever ago so who knows: but I heard your brain releases dumb amounts of DMT right as you die, which is also a chemical your brain elicits while dreaming
What do you mean tides are “powered” by momentum? They’re “powered” by the moon’s gravity. And the sun literally does “renew” rotational momentum…? I respectfully don’t know what you’re saying.
Theres articles and research going on discussing placing wind farms in common hurricane paths as a means to sap the energy from them and reduce damages.
If you place massive windfarms in places that contain lots of wind energy, you will remove energy from the system and change downstream climate cycles.
I’ve made similar comments regarding wind energy. If taken to massive scale it will impact downstream climate patterns.
I usually get downvoted to oblivion like people think I’m attacking renewable energy. My point being that its only renewable up-to a certain scale.
Training that neural network must have been a treat
Are we using dumb names for people now, too?