Yeah, of it either becomes too popular or too conventient, then it MUST be destroyed! :(

Kek. He’s not the cause, he’s the symptom.

At least looks like it from over here. Not that we’re much better, we’re just not Trump-levels of bad yet. ^,’

Can confirm, I’m penguin and do Wine all the time!

This cannot possibly backfire. I’m sure he’s finally given up on the futile. Time to make a white November.

What? Outrageous! I want my flowers pollen- and parechyma-free!

I actually had that up and running before they changed our modem and threw us behind their regular CGNAT. I’ve tried bridging the modem, but it’s no use if the bridge leads to their intermidiary network and not the public internet. :(

They problably hadn’t realized (or didn’t care) that we had a unique IPv4 before, so I was lucky enough that simply opening up the provided modem and my router was enough. Now they want 15€ a month for the same service, but at least it’ll be static…

Wax is great! Sadly most wax nowadays is made of oil.

I’m not gonna give up my microplastics! >:(

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I’ve spent the evening playing around with Netbird/Tailscale. Appears that UDP in Netbird requires Traefik, so I’ve switched over to that (wanted to do this anyway).

Turns out that Traefik is perfectly able to do the proxying over my “stupid” wireguard setup, so I’ll be running that for now and look more into it later.

Oh no, that’s VILE! x)

Lots of people think it’s only AI if it’s at least a Machine-Learning enabled Neural Network whose model is at least of 1B+ parameter complexity and runs on a digital computer using NVIDIA hardware.

It isn’t, or at least wasn’t, unless you use the techbro definition from the past 10 or so years (or the Hollywood definition from before that).

Bristlebots were some of the most simple proto-AI you could make. They are capable of navigation and object-avoidance in 3D space and even show simple swarm behavior, even without any kind of computing power or “brain”.

Hey now, it could be worse, you could have lost the game (again).

As a relict from the past millennia, I’d like to thank you for your service.

I think I saw that tailscale (or netbird, the open source and selfhosted version) also can reverse proxy UDP traffic.

I’ll take a look at it later today.

As I said, I’ve got a VPS. The VPS is not on my local net, but in a datacenter. As part of being a VPS it has a unique IPv4.

My VPN (which I currently use for TCP traffic) is hosted on the VPS, giving me access to (and from) all devices connected to my VPN regardless of whether they are behind a NAT or not.

I’ve also got a beefy server which hosts more power hungry services, though this one is behind multiple layers of NAT. I can forward and reverse-proxy TCP services from the beefy server through the VPN and out to the public net using another server with a unique IPv4 just fine.

What I (and OP) need, is to also be able to forward\reverse-proxy UDP services from a beefy NATed/firewalled server through a VPN and out to the public internet using another server which has a unique IPv4.

Can’t port forward through the CGNAT of my ISP, only my own router’s NAT.

That is, unless I buy a unique IPv4 from my ISP.

The game server is probably behind a NAT. I’m standing in the same situation.

Got a small VPS with a TCP VPN to access all my devices despite location, and a comparably powerfull server behind a NAT which I would like to host UDP services on.

It needs to be said that we are talking actual VPNs here, and not “VPN-as-proxy” to spoof your location etc.