I can’t imagine why they’d do a Starliner cargo flight instead of another crewed flight test.
Maybe a less expensive (for Boeing) option would be a commercial Starliner mission to the ISS for a week or two the way Axiom has run commercial Dragon missions? I’m sure the Oceansgate type of customers would love paying for a private flight test and LARPing as explorers.
The founder has been on the Pathfinder podcast a few times now. I think it’s an interesting listen, but maybe a just drank the Koolaid. They already launched a forge demonstrator, then largely built this new fly-by bus from scratch. Launch prices and availability, specifically lunar rideshares to jump to deep space, are making the business case more viable.
This isn’t Kerbal Space Program, they can’t just stick some SRBs on as an afterthought.
Maybe Terran R will keep slowly turning into Ariane R, including some Vega SRBs. Or Avio will copy Northrop’s homework and bid VegA for a DoD contract. Or they want to steal SLS BOLE. Or… or they’re cool with just selling rockets for missiles and reminding people that they also do launch vehicles.
Haolong, Haolong will I slide?
I wonder when we’ll actually see these fly. I’m rooting for the little space plane.
Avio seeks to provide additional capacity to the industrial base for large solid rocket motor boosters in the United States
For what rockets? SLS and Vulcan are the only American rockets with SRBs. Also still Minotaur, but I’ll keep ignoring that. So, does Avio want to compete with Northrop for SLS and Vulcan?
They said they’re waiting until another round of testing is done by the end of Nov, all the Artemis 2 options are considered, and the administrator picks one, which should wrap up by the end of the year.
Did NASA ever actually say that about Starship?
Shuttle had abort modes that mostly involve landing “normally”. After jettisoning the SRBs, depending on how far it got and the target inclination, it could return to launch site, land in Europe or Africa, do one orbit then land back in the US, or abort to a lower than intended orbit, which actually happened once after an engine failure.
Starship can also do a pad abort, where the whole ship / upper stage separates from the 1st stage.
Time to go look at an asteroid. This is for their fly-by and tech demonstration mission before they try mining.
Cockroaches! Hopefully we at least get some new creative launch failures out of the resurrection.
…but they won’t tell us what it is yet. And they haven’t settled on how to make Artemis 2 safe.
I probably misremembered/misrepresented that. NASA would actually have to book more SpaceX flights to not have Starliner go back-to-back at this point.
The bigger question might be what Boeing’s refurb/turnaround time is, and whether they can even prep one of their two vehicles and a new service module in 5 months to support a back-to-back.
I couldn’t dream up a more fitting ending for the Bears
Yeah, alternate title: “Feedback Loop Works”.
Can tiny SpaceX rock Boeing?
They could literally buy part of Boeing’s space division if they saw any value in it. How the turntables.
And soon(ish) the new Bolt, EX30, EV3, and R3.
Idk, Millennium, a Boeing subsidiary that makes satellites, just got a pretty good contract.
https://spacenews.com/millennium-space-secures-386-million-contract-for-missile-defense-satellites/
The suborbital one? At least this one sort of goes to orbit.
The Bucks blue is always weird (their yellow was even worse imo), but I think the antlers on the court look a lot better than whatever shadows and text and clipart are on the rest of them.
If you haven’t seen it, the SmarterEveryDay tour of the ULA factory is a good look at the Atlas production line.
I didn’t expect the tail end of the Atlas V launch manifest to drag out so long, but I figured Starliner and Kuiper would be flying more regularly by now.