Decent game to quit about 30h in because while it’s good and fun to play, it’s incredibly repetitive.
Decent game to quit about 30h in because while it’s good and fun to play, it’s incredibly repetitive.
Science and academia, too. There’s way too few papers being published about failed experimemts. “I thought A, so I did B in order to achieve C, but it didn’t work out because of D.” is a very useful result.
Translation:
The girlfriend/female friend
Official publication of the “Association for human rights (registered club)”, Berlin
(The ideal friendship paper)
Bimonthly periodical for education on ideal women’s friendship.
From the contents:
A suit seems like good attire for a showmaster and/or business man
The path of grace is literally a giant yellow floating laser pointing in a general direction. It’s not precise, but “subtle” is not exactly the word I would use.
Nuclear is literally the most expensive way to generate energy and no amount of liquid salt or SMR hallucinations can come even close to fixing that problem.
You don’t need to create fear of nuclear, it’s a bad choice all by itself.
The IKEA blue whale is called Blåvingad
Maybe try getting an MEP for Greens/EFA or the Left?
Also, why should we hail the size of energy drink cans?
Always a great game to get back into. Or get into in the first place.
The latest patch was kind of disappointing and I hope they do tweak some of the issues, but I’m still looking forward to the new expansion reveal tomorrow. The teasers were pretty neat so far.
If the IT departments of any major corp allows anyone within their network to enable this feature, they and everyone the work for need a permanent waning label for idiocy and utter incompetence attached to their resume.
That looks like it is made from compressed lint
Now I know what I’ll watch for breakfast, thanks
Not to defend the Nazis here, but working prisoners to death predates them by a couple millenia. They just did it on an unprecedented scale.
Ironically, what the Nazis did in the extermination camps was mass executions, i.e. the very thing anon finds wasteful.
Don’t worry, we have that registry in Germany as well. And you have to pay to get your own data from them (although a GDPR request works once a year)
There was a specific number that was repeated across a lot of papers in my field, always citing the same source.
That source did have the number, but it cited another paper for it, which itself cited yet an older paper. Im not sure where the citations went bad, but that last paper for not actually contain the value everyone waschain-attributing to it.
The number was fortunately still correct though (and people would have noticed pretty quickly if it wasn’t).
In other words, the question becomes: “Is an egg defined by the creature that laid it, or the creature that will hatch from it?”
One other thing here is that the sensitivity of the detection is actually decreased with repeat attempts. This is pretty standard.
The reasoning here is that people will check after the first failure. And if they then send the close request again, the car will try a bit harder. Maybe it’s just some bit of oversized luggage that can be pushed down.
I was curious and still read the article. It’s far far worse than I ever imagined.