@bernard - eviltoast

-A cyborg mostly in control of implants -A carbon based product of Silicon Valley -Watched over by big brother in a tyranny of convenience -Proponent of free speech -Opponent of Newspeak -Pusher of boundaries -Nonmember of the Uniparty

  • 1 Post
  • 8 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2024

help-circle

  • That is a greater good argument, but who really benefits here? In a somewhat best case scenario, some big companies and their equity owners gain all the data and perhaps develop proprietary solutions only they can prescribe. We then sacrifice our collective health privacy for some people who might benefit if they pay an uncompetitive price for the treatment. In a worse case situation, no cures or treatments are ever found, but these companies benefit from the surveillance and knowing what existing drugs and treatments they should invest money in to profit from, allowing them to game the market.

    If this data was held in the commons and the benefits such as cures or treatments were not patented, we might have some incentive to provide it. In this case, everything is privatized for the benefit of a few.



  • As others have stated, you are mixing search engines with metasearch engines here. If you employ browser isolation and obscure your IP address, you can be anonymous with any engine.

    Yacy has potential, and I run an instance. It relies on us operators to index sites. You will find results to be incomplete in many areas, but it can be great for researching controversial topics. When I want uncensored and not manipulated results, I also use Yandex.com and Brave.